+
+if [ $NUMREGRESS -eq 0 ] || [ $add_passes_despite_regression -ne 0 ] ; then
+ # Update the state.
+ for LOG in $TESTLOGS ; do
+ L=`basename $LOG`
+ awk '/^PASS: / { print "'$L'",$2; }' $LOG || exit 1
+ done | sort | uniq | comm -23 - $FAILED > ${PASSES}~ || exit 1
+ [ -s ${PASSES}~ ] || exit 1
+ if [ $NUMREGRESS -ne 0 ] ; then
+ # The way we keep track of new PASSes when in "regress-N" for
+ # --add-passes-despite-regression, is to *add* them to previous
+ # PASSes. Just as without this option, we don't forget *any* PASS
+ # lines, because besides the ones in $REGRESS that we definitely
+ # don't want to lose, their removal or rename may have been a
+ # mistake (as in, the cause of the "regress-N" state). If they
+ # come back, we then know they're regressions.
+ cat ${PASSES}~ ${PASSES} | sort -u > ${PASSES}~~
+ mv ${PASSES}~~ ${PASSES} || exit 1
+ rm ${PASSES}~ || exit 1
+ else
+ # In contrast to the merging for "regress-N", we just overwrite
+ # the known PASSes when in the "pass" state, so we get rid of
+ # stale PASS lines for removed, moved or otherwise changed tests
+ # which may be added back with a different meaning later on.
+ mv ${PASSES}~ ${PASSES} || exit 1
+ fi
+fi
+