]> oss.titaniummirror.com Git - msp430-gcc.git/blobdiff - libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/bk01pt12ch33s03.html
Imported gcc-4.4.3
[msp430-gcc.git] / libstdc++-v3 / doc / html / manual / bk01pt12ch33s03.html
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/bk01pt12ch33s03.html b/libstdc++-v3/doc/html/manual/bk01pt12ch33s03.html
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c1aa5dc
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>Deprecated HP/SGI</title><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.74.0" /><meta name="keywords" content="&#10;      ISO C++&#10;    , &#10;      library&#10;    " /><link rel="home" href="../spine.html" title="The GNU C++ Library Documentation" /><link rel="up" href="ext_containers.html" title="Chapter 33. Containers" /><link rel="prev" href="bk01pt12ch33s02.html" title="HP/SGI" /><link rel="next" href="ext_utilities.html" title="Chapter 34. Utilities" /></head><body><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Deprecated HP/SGI</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="bk01pt12ch33s02.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">Chapter 33. Containers</th><td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="ext_utilities.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr /></div><div class="sect1" lang="en" xml:lang="en"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both"><a id="manual.ext.containers.deprecated_sgi"></a>Deprecated HP/SGI</h2></div></div></div><p>
+     The SGI hashing classes <code class="classname">hash_set</code> and
+     <code class="classname">hash_set</code> have been deprecated by the
+     unordered_set, unordered_multiset, unordered_map,
+     unordered_multimap containers in TR1 and the upcoming C++0x, and
+     may be removed in future releases.
+   </p><p>The SGI headers</p><pre class="programlisting">
+     &lt;hash_map&gt;
+     &lt;hash_set&gt;
+     &lt;rope&gt;
+     &lt;slist&gt;
+     &lt;rb_tree&gt;
+   </pre><p>are all here;
+      <code class="code">&lt;hash_map&gt;</code> and <code class="code">&lt;hash_set&gt;</code>
+      are deprecated but available as backwards-compatible extensions,
+      as discussed further below.  <code class="code">&lt;rope&gt;</code> is the
+      SGI specialization for large strings ("rope,"
+      "large strings," get it? Love that geeky humor.)
+      <code class="code">&lt;slist&gt;</code> is a singly-linked list, for when the
+      doubly-linked <code class="code">list&lt;&gt;</code> is too much space
+      overhead, and <code class="code">&lt;rb_tree&gt;</code> exposes the red-black
+      tree classes used in the implementation of the standard maps and
+      sets.
+   </p><p>Each of the associative containers map, multimap, set, and multiset
+      have a counterpart which uses a
+      <a class="ulink" href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/HashFunction.html" target="_top">hashing
+      function</a> to do the arranging, instead of a strict weak ordering
+      function.  The classes take as one of their template parameters a
+      function object that will return the hash value; by default, an
+      instantiation of
+      <a class="ulink" href="http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/hash.html" target="_top">hash</a>.
+      You should specialize this functor for your class, or define your own,
+      before trying to use one of the hashing classes.
+   </p><p>The hashing classes support all the usual associative container
+      functions, as well as some extra constructors specifying the number
+      of buckets, etc.
+   </p><p>Why would you want to use a hashing class instead of the
+      “<span class="quote">normal</span>”implementations?  Matt Austern writes:
+   </p><div class="blockquote"><blockquote class="blockquote"><p>
+       <span class="emphasis"><em>[W]ith a well chosen hash function, hash tables
+       generally provide much better average-case performance than
+       binary search trees, and much worse worst-case performance.  So
+       if your implementation has hash_map, if you don't mind using
+       nonstandard components, and if you aren't scared about the
+       possibility of pathological cases, you'll probably get better
+       performance from hash_map.
+     </em></span>
+     </p></blockquote></div></div><div class="navfooter"><hr /><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="bk01pt12ch33s02.html">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="ext_containers.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="ext_utilities.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">HP/SGI </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="../spine.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Chapter 34. Utilities</td></tr></table></div></body></html>