From 4ba7aa9211d754b2d11e6cf91712494b2e3dbd98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: smckown Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:57:46 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove incorrect comment from Msp430SpiP. --- tos/chips/msp430/usci/Msp430SpiP.nc | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tos/chips/msp430/usci/Msp430SpiP.nc b/tos/chips/msp430/usci/Msp430SpiP.nc index dad8e824..e44a0454 100644 --- a/tos/chips/msp430/usci/Msp430SpiP.nc +++ b/tos/chips/msp430/usci/Msp430SpiP.nc @@ -206,11 +206,6 @@ implementation { void sendData() { - /* We don't need to check Registers.getIfgTx() (aks UCxxTXIFG), as - * sendData() is only called after peripheral init or receipt of the rx() - * interrupt. SPI on msp430 guarantees UCxxTXIFG is asserted in both of - * these cases. - */ atomic { uint16_t end = m_pos + (blockSize ? blockSize : BLOCKSIZE_DEFAULT); uint8_t tmp; -- 2.39.2