From eaf09b7f1f9b7501d842707cc3d290cdd8d3bb98 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: smckown <smckown@4bc1554a-c7f2-4f65-a403-e0be01f0239c>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 18:21:57 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Comment about USCI pin mapping problems.

---
 tos/chips/msp430/pins/HplMsp430GeneralIOC.nc | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tos/chips/msp430/pins/HplMsp430GeneralIOC.nc b/tos/chips/msp430/pins/HplMsp430GeneralIOC.nc
index 4b20beee..0defab4e 100644
--- a/tos/chips/msp430/pins/HplMsp430GeneralIOC.nc
+++ b/tos/chips/msp430/pins/HplMsp430GeneralIOC.nc
@@ -548,6 +548,11 @@ implementation
 #endif
 
 #if defined(__MSP430_HAS_USCI_AB0__) || defined(__MSP430_HAS_USCI__)
+  /* TODO: these mappings are broken for many parts defining
+   * __MSP430_HAS_USCI__.  For example, the MSP420F2112 has USCI pin
+   * assignements different than below.  Further, the pin assignements vary
+   * by package.
+   */
   UCA0CLK = P30;
   UCA0STE = P33;
   UCA0TXD = P34;
-- 
2.39.2