X-Git-Url: https://oss.titaniummirror.com/gitweb?a=blobdiff_plain;f=gcc%2Fada%2Fsem_ch5.adb;fp=gcc%2Fada%2Fsem_ch5.adb;h=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hb=6fed43773c9b0ce596dca5686f37ac3fc0fa11c0;hp=ec43cf76f7828a28c5c17ea96556885976a80e81;hpb=27b11d56b743098deb193d510b337ba22dc52e5c;p=msp430-gcc.git diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch5.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch5.adb deleted file mode 100644 index ec43cf76..00000000 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch5.adb +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1258 +0,0 @@ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- -- --- GNAT COMPILER COMPONENTS -- --- -- --- S E M _ C H 5 -- --- -- --- B o d y -- --- -- --- $Revision: 1.4.10.1 $ --- -- --- Copyright (C) 1992-2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. -- --- -- --- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under -- --- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- -- --- ware Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later ver- -- --- sion. GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITH- -- --- OUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY -- --- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License -- --- for more details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General -- --- Public License distributed with GNAT; see file COPYING. If not, write -- --- to the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, -- --- MA 02111-1307, USA. -- --- -- --- GNAT was originally developed by the GNAT team at New York University. -- --- Extensive contributions were provided by Ada Core Technologies Inc. -- --- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -with Atree; use Atree; -with Checks; use Checks; -with Einfo; use Einfo; -with Errout; use Errout; -with Expander; use Expander; -with Exp_Util; use Exp_Util; -with Freeze; use Freeze; -with Lib.Xref; use Lib.Xref; -with Nlists; use Nlists; -with Opt; use Opt; -with Sem; use Sem; -with Sem_Case; use Sem_Case; -with Sem_Ch3; use Sem_Ch3; -with Sem_Ch8; use Sem_Ch8; -with Sem_Disp; use Sem_Disp; -with Sem_Eval; use Sem_Eval; -with Sem_Res; use Sem_Res; -with Sem_Type; use Sem_Type; -with Sem_Util; use Sem_Util; -with Sem_Warn; use Sem_Warn; -with Stand; use Stand; -with Sinfo; use Sinfo; -with Tbuild; use Tbuild; -with Uintp; use Uintp; - -package body Sem_Ch5 is - - Unblocked_Exit_Count : Nat := 0; - -- This variable is used when processing if statements or case - -- statements, it counts the number of branches of the conditional - -- that are not blocked by unconditional transfer instructions. At - -- the end of processing, if the count is zero, it means that control - -- cannot fall through the conditional statement. This is used for - -- the generation of warning messages. This variable is recursively - -- saved on entry to processing an if or case, and restored on exit. - - ----------------------- - -- Local Subprograms -- - ----------------------- - - procedure Analyze_Iteration_Scheme (N : Node_Id); - - ------------------------ - -- Analyze_Assignment -- - ------------------------ - - procedure Analyze_Assignment (N : Node_Id) is - Lhs : constant Node_Id := Name (N); - Rhs : constant Node_Id := Expression (N); - T1, T2 : Entity_Id; - Decl : Node_Id; - - procedure Diagnose_Non_Variable_Lhs (N : Node_Id); - -- N is the node for the left hand side of an assignment, and it - -- is not a variable. This routine issues an appropriate diagnostic. - - procedure Set_Assignment_Type - (Opnd : Node_Id; - Opnd_Type : in out Entity_Id); - -- Opnd is either the Lhs or Rhs of the assignment, and Opnd_Type - -- is the nominal subtype. This procedure is used to deal with cases - -- where the nominal subtype must be replaced by the actual subtype. - - ------------------------------- - -- Diagnose_Non_Variable_Lhs -- - ------------------------------- - - procedure Diagnose_Non_Variable_Lhs (N : Node_Id) is - begin - -- Not worth posting another error if left hand side already - -- flagged as being illegal in some respect - - if Error_Posted (N) then - return; - - -- Some special bad cases of entity names - - elsif Is_Entity_Name (N) then - - if Ekind (Entity (N)) = E_In_Parameter then - Error_Msg_N - ("assignment to IN mode parameter not allowed", N); - return; - - -- Private declarations in a protected object are turned into - -- constants when compiling a protected function. - - elsif Present (Scope (Entity (N))) - and then Is_Protected_Type (Scope (Entity (N))) - and then - (Ekind (Current_Scope) = E_Function - or else - Ekind (Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (Current_Scope)) = E_Function) - then - Error_Msg_N - ("protected function cannot modify protected object", N); - return; - - elsif Ekind (Entity (N)) = E_Loop_Parameter then - Error_Msg_N - ("assignment to loop parameter not allowed", N); - return; - - end if; - - -- For indexed components, or selected components, test prefix - - elsif Nkind (N) = N_Indexed_Component - or else Nkind (N) = N_Selected_Component - then - Diagnose_Non_Variable_Lhs (Prefix (N)); - return; - end if; - - -- If we fall through, we have no special message to issue! - - Error_Msg_N ("left hand side of assignment must be a variable", N); - - end Diagnose_Non_Variable_Lhs; - - ------------------------- - -- Set_Assignment_Type -- - ------------------------- - - procedure Set_Assignment_Type - (Opnd : Node_Id; - Opnd_Type : in out Entity_Id) - is - begin - -- If the assignment operand is an in-out or out parameter, then we - -- get the actual subtype (needed for the unconstrained case). - - if Is_Entity_Name (Opnd) - and then (Ekind (Entity (Opnd)) = E_Out_Parameter - or else Ekind (Entity (Opnd)) = - E_In_Out_Parameter - or else Ekind (Entity (Opnd)) = - E_Generic_In_Out_Parameter) - then - Opnd_Type := Get_Actual_Subtype (Opnd); - - -- If assignment operand is a component reference, then we get the - -- actual subtype of the component for the unconstrained case. - - elsif Nkind (Opnd) = N_Selected_Component - or else Nkind (Opnd) = N_Explicit_Dereference - then - Decl := Build_Actual_Subtype_Of_Component (Opnd_Type, Opnd); - - if Present (Decl) then - Insert_Action (N, Decl); - Mark_Rewrite_Insertion (Decl); - Analyze (Decl); - Opnd_Type := Defining_Identifier (Decl); - Set_Etype (Opnd, Opnd_Type); - Freeze_Itype (Opnd_Type, N); - - elsif Is_Constrained (Etype (Opnd)) then - Opnd_Type := Etype (Opnd); - end if; - - -- For slice, use the constrained subtype created for the slice - - elsif Nkind (Opnd) = N_Slice then - Opnd_Type := Etype (Opnd); - end if; - end Set_Assignment_Type; - - -- Start of processing for Analyze_Assignment - - begin - Analyze (Rhs); - Analyze (Lhs); - T1 := Etype (Lhs); - - -- In the most general case, both Lhs and Rhs can be overloaded, and we - -- must compute the intersection of the possible types on each side. - - if Is_Overloaded (Lhs) then - declare - I : Interp_Index; - It : Interp; - - begin - T1 := Any_Type; - Get_First_Interp (Lhs, I, It); - - while Present (It.Typ) loop - if Has_Compatible_Type (Rhs, It.Typ) then - - if T1 /= Any_Type then - - -- An explicit dereference is overloaded if the prefix - -- is. Try to remove the ambiguity on the prefix, the - -- error will be posted there if the ambiguity is real. - - if Nkind (Lhs) = N_Explicit_Dereference then - declare - PI : Interp_Index; - PI1 : Interp_Index := 0; - PIt : Interp; - Found : Boolean; - - begin - Found := False; - Get_First_Interp (Prefix (Lhs), PI, PIt); - - while Present (PIt.Typ) loop - if Has_Compatible_Type (Rhs, - Designated_Type (PIt.Typ)) - then - if Found then - PIt := - Disambiguate (Prefix (Lhs), - PI1, PI, Any_Type); - - if PIt = No_Interp then - return; - else - Resolve (Prefix (Lhs), PIt.Typ); - end if; - - exit; - else - Found := True; - PI1 := PI; - end if; - end if; - - Get_Next_Interp (PI, PIt); - end loop; - end; - - else - Error_Msg_N - ("ambiguous left-hand side in assignment", Lhs); - exit; - end if; - else - T1 := It.Typ; - end if; - end if; - - Get_Next_Interp (I, It); - end loop; - end; - - if T1 = Any_Type then - Error_Msg_N - ("no valid types for left-hand side for assignment", Lhs); - return; - end if; - end if; - - Resolve (Lhs, T1); - - if not Is_Variable (Lhs) then - Diagnose_Non_Variable_Lhs (Lhs); - return; - - elsif Is_Limited_Type (T1) - and then not Assignment_OK (Lhs) - and then not Assignment_OK (Original_Node (Lhs)) - then - Error_Msg_N - ("left hand of assignment must not be limited type", Lhs); - return; - end if; - - -- Resolution may have updated the subtype, in case the left-hand - -- side is a private protected component. Use the correct subtype - -- to avoid scoping issues in the back-end. - - T1 := Etype (Lhs); - Set_Assignment_Type (Lhs, T1); - - Resolve (Rhs, T1); - - -- Remaining steps are skipped if Rhs was synatactically in error - - if Rhs = Error then - return; - end if; - - T2 := Etype (Rhs); - Check_Unset_Reference (Rhs); - Note_Possible_Modification (Lhs); - - if Covers (T1, T2) then - null; - else - Wrong_Type (Rhs, Etype (Lhs)); - return; - end if; - - Set_Assignment_Type (Rhs, T2); - - if T1 = Any_Type or else T2 = Any_Type then - return; - end if; - - if (Is_Class_Wide_Type (T2) or else Is_Dynamically_Tagged (Rhs)) - and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (T1) - then - Error_Msg_N ("dynamically tagged expression not allowed!", Rhs); - - elsif Is_Class_Wide_Type (T1) - and then not Is_Class_Wide_Type (T2) - and then not Is_Tag_Indeterminate (Rhs) - and then not Is_Dynamically_Tagged (Rhs) - then - Error_Msg_N ("dynamically tagged expression required!", Rhs); - end if; - - -- Tag propagation is done only in semantics mode only. If expansion - -- is on, the rhs tag indeterminate function call has been expanded - -- and tag propagation would have happened too late, so the - -- propagation take place in expand_call instead. - - if not Expander_Active - and then Is_Class_Wide_Type (T1) - and then Is_Tag_Indeterminate (Rhs) - then - Propagate_Tag (Lhs, Rhs); - end if; - - if Is_Scalar_Type (T1) then - Apply_Scalar_Range_Check (Rhs, Etype (Lhs)); - - elsif Is_Array_Type (T1) then - - -- Assignment verifies that the length of the Lsh and Rhs are equal, - -- but of course the indices do not have to match. - - Apply_Length_Check (Rhs, Etype (Lhs)); - - else - -- Discriminant checks are applied in the course of expansion. - null; - end if; - - -- ??? a real accessibility check is needed when ??? - - -- Post warning for useless assignment - - if Warn_On_Redundant_Constructs - - -- We only warn for source constructs - - and then Comes_From_Source (N) - - -- Where the entity is the same on both sides - - and then Is_Entity_Name (Lhs) - and then Is_Entity_Name (Rhs) - and then Entity (Lhs) = Entity (Rhs) - - -- But exclude the case where the right side was an operation - -- that got rewritten (e.g. JUNK + K, where K was known to be - -- zero). We don't want to warn in such a case, since it is - -- reasonable to write such expressions especially when K is - -- defined symbolically in some other package. - - and then Nkind (Original_Node (Rhs)) not in N_Op - then - Error_Msg_NE - ("?useless assignment of & to itself", N, Entity (Lhs)); - end if; - end Analyze_Assignment; - - ----------------------------- - -- Analyze_Block_Statement -- - ----------------------------- - - procedure Analyze_Block_Statement (N : Node_Id) is - Decls : constant List_Id := Declarations (N); - Id : constant Node_Id := Identifier (N); - Ent : Entity_Id; - - begin - -- If a label is present analyze it and mark it as referenced - - if Present (Id) then - Analyze (Id); - Ent := Entity (Id); - Set_Ekind (Ent, E_Block); - Generate_Reference (Ent, N, ' '); - Generate_Definition (Ent); - - if Nkind (Parent (Ent)) = N_Implicit_Label_Declaration then - Set_Label_Construct (Parent (Ent), N); - end if; - - -- Otherwise create a label entity - - else - Ent := New_Internal_Entity (E_Block, Current_Scope, Sloc (N), 'B'); - Set_Identifier (N, New_Occurrence_Of (Ent, Sloc (N))); - end if; - - Set_Etype (Ent, Standard_Void_Type); - Set_Block_Node (Ent, Identifier (N)); - New_Scope (Ent); - - if Present (Decls) then - Analyze_Declarations (Decls); - Check_Completion; - end if; - - Analyze (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N)); - Process_End_Label (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N), 'e'); - - -- Analyze exception handlers if present. Note that the test for - -- HSS being present is an error defence against previous errors. - - if Present (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N)) - and then Present (Exception_Handlers (Handled_Statement_Sequence (N))) - then - declare - S : Entity_Id := Scope (Ent); - - begin - -- Indicate that enclosing scopes contain a block with handlers. - -- Only non-generic scopes need to be marked. - - loop - Set_Has_Nested_Block_With_Handler (S); - exit when Is_Overloadable (S) - or else Ekind (S) = E_Package - or else Ekind (S) = E_Generic_Function - or else Ekind (S) = E_Generic_Package - or else Ekind (S) = E_Generic_Procedure; - S := Scope (S); - end loop; - end; - end if; - - Check_References (Ent); - End_Scope; - end Analyze_Block_Statement; - - ---------------------------- - -- Analyze_Case_Statement -- - ---------------------------- - - procedure Analyze_Case_Statement (N : Node_Id) is - - Statements_Analyzed : Boolean := False; - -- Set True if at least some statement sequences get analyzed. - -- If False on exit, means we had a serious error that prevented - -- full analysis of the case statement, and as a result it is not - -- a good idea to output warning messages about unreachable code. - - Save_Unblocked_Exit_Count : constant Nat := Unblocked_Exit_Count; - -- Recursively save value of this global, will be restored on exit - - procedure Non_Static_Choice_Error (Choice : Node_Id); - -- Error routine invoked by the generic instantiation below when - -- the case statement has a non static choice. - - procedure Process_Statements (Alternative : Node_Id); - -- Analyzes all the statements associated to a case alternative. - -- Needed by the generic instantiation below. - - package Case_Choices_Processing is new - Generic_Choices_Processing - (Get_Alternatives => Alternatives, - Get_Choices => Discrete_Choices, - Process_Empty_Choice => No_OP, - Process_Non_Static_Choice => Non_Static_Choice_Error, - Process_Associated_Node => Process_Statements); - use Case_Choices_Processing; - -- Instantiation of the generic choice processing package. - - ----------------------------- - -- Non_Static_Choice_Error -- - ----------------------------- - - procedure Non_Static_Choice_Error (Choice : Node_Id) is - begin - Error_Msg_N ("choice given in case statement is not static", Choice); - end Non_Static_Choice_Error; - - ------------------------ - -- Process_Statements -- - ------------------------ - - procedure Process_Statements (Alternative : Node_Id) is - begin - Unblocked_Exit_Count := Unblocked_Exit_Count + 1; - Statements_Analyzed := True; - Analyze_Statements (Statements (Alternative)); - end Process_Statements; - - -- Variables local to Analyze_Case_Statement. - - Exp : Node_Id; - Exp_Type : Entity_Id; - Exp_Btype : Entity_Id; - - Case_Table : Choice_Table_Type (1 .. Number_Of_Choices (N)); - Last_Choice : Nat; - Dont_Care : Boolean; - Others_Present : Boolean; - - -- Start of processing for Analyze_Case_Statement - - begin - Unblocked_Exit_Count := 0; - Exp := Expression (N); - Analyze_And_Resolve (Exp, Any_Discrete); - Check_Unset_Reference (Exp); - Exp_Type := Etype (Exp); - Exp_Btype := Base_Type (Exp_Type); - - -- The expression must be of a discrete type which must be determinable - -- independently of the context in which the expression occurs, but - -- using the fact that the expression must be of a discrete type. - -- Moreover, the type this expression must not be a character literal - -- (which is always ambiguous) or, for Ada-83, a generic formal type. - - -- If error already reported by Resolve, nothing more to do - - if Exp_Btype = Any_Discrete - or else Exp_Btype = Any_Type - then - return; - - elsif Exp_Btype = Any_Character then - Error_Msg_N - ("character literal as case expression is ambiguous", Exp); - return; - - elsif Ada_83 - and then (Is_Generic_Type (Exp_Btype) - or else Is_Generic_Type (Root_Type (Exp_Btype))) - then - Error_Msg_N - ("(Ada 83) case expression cannot be of a generic type", Exp); - return; - end if; - - -- If the case expression is a formal object of mode in out, - -- then treat it as having a nonstatic subtype by forcing - -- use of the base type (which has to get passed to - -- Check_Case_Choices below). Also use base type when - -- the case expression is parenthesized. - - if Paren_Count (Exp) > 0 - or else (Is_Entity_Name (Exp) - and then Ekind (Entity (Exp)) = E_Generic_In_Out_Parameter) - then - Exp_Type := Exp_Btype; - end if; - - -- Call the instantiated Analyze_Choices which does the rest of the work - - Analyze_Choices - (N, Exp_Type, Case_Table, Last_Choice, Dont_Care, Others_Present); - - if Exp_Type = Universal_Integer and then not Others_Present then - Error_Msg_N ("case on universal integer requires OTHERS choice", Exp); - end if; - - -- If all our exits were blocked by unconditional transfers of control, - -- then the entire CASE statement acts as an unconditional transfer of - -- control, so treat it like one, and check unreachable code. Skip this - -- test if we had serious errors preventing any statement analysis. - - if Unblocked_Exit_Count = 0 and then Statements_Analyzed then - Unblocked_Exit_Count := Save_Unblocked_Exit_Count; - Check_Unreachable_Code (N); - else - Unblocked_Exit_Count := Save_Unblocked_Exit_Count; - end if; - end Analyze_Case_Statement; - - ---------------------------- - -- Analyze_Exit_Statement -- - ---------------------------- - - -- If the exit includes a name, it must be the name of a currently open - -- loop. Otherwise there must be an innermost open loop on the stack, - -- to which the statement implicitly refers. - - procedure Analyze_Exit_Statement (N : Node_Id) is - Target : constant Node_Id := Name (N); - Cond : constant Node_Id := Condition (N); - Scope_Id : Entity_Id; - U_Name : Entity_Id; - Kind : Entity_Kind; - - begin - if No (Cond) then - Check_Unreachable_Code (N); - end if; - - if Present (Target) then - Analyze (Target); - U_Name := Entity (Target); - - if not In_Open_Scopes (U_Name) or else Ekind (U_Name) /= E_Loop then - Error_Msg_N ("invalid loop name in exit statement", N); - return; - else - Set_Has_Exit (U_Name); - end if; - - else - U_Name := Empty; - end if; - - for J in reverse 0 .. Scope_Stack.Last loop - Scope_Id := Scope_Stack.Table (J).Entity; - Kind := Ekind (Scope_Id); - - if Kind = E_Loop - and then (No (Target) or else Scope_Id = U_Name) then - Set_Has_Exit (Scope_Id); - exit; - - elsif Kind = E_Block or else Kind = E_Loop then - null; - - else - Error_Msg_N - ("cannot exit from program unit or accept statement", N); - exit; - end if; - end loop; - - -- Verify that if present the condition is a Boolean expression. - - if Present (Cond) then - Analyze_And_Resolve (Cond, Any_Boolean); - Check_Unset_Reference (Cond); - end if; - end Analyze_Exit_Statement; - - ---------------------------- - -- Analyze_Goto_Statement -- - ---------------------------- - - procedure Analyze_Goto_Statement (N : Node_Id) is - Label : constant Node_Id := Name (N); - Scope_Id : Entity_Id; - Label_Scope : Entity_Id; - - begin - Check_Unreachable_Code (N); - - Analyze (Label); - - if Entity (Label) = Any_Id then - return; - - elsif Ekind (Entity (Label)) /= E_Label then - Error_Msg_N ("target of goto statement must be a label", Label); - return; - - elsif not Reachable (Entity (Label)) then - Error_Msg_N ("target of goto statement is not reachable", Label); - return; - end if; - - Label_Scope := Enclosing_Scope (Entity (Label)); - - for J in reverse 0 .. Scope_Stack.Last loop - Scope_Id := Scope_Stack.Table (J).Entity; - - if Label_Scope = Scope_Id - or else (Ekind (Scope_Id) /= E_Block - and then Ekind (Scope_Id) /= E_Loop) - then - if Scope_Id /= Label_Scope then - Error_Msg_N - ("cannot exit from program unit or accept statement", N); - end if; - - return; - end if; - end loop; - - raise Program_Error; - - end Analyze_Goto_Statement; - - -------------------------- - -- Analyze_If_Statement -- - -------------------------- - - -- A special complication arises in the analysis of if statements. - -- The expander has circuitry to completely deleted code that it - -- can tell will not be executed (as a result of compile time known - -- conditions). In the analyzer, we ensure that code that will be - -- deleted in this manner is analyzed but not expanded. This is - -- obviously more efficient, but more significantly, difficulties - -- arise if code is expanded and then eliminated (e.g. exception - -- table entries disappear). - - procedure Analyze_If_Statement (N : Node_Id) is - E : Node_Id; - - Save_Unblocked_Exit_Count : constant Nat := Unblocked_Exit_Count; - -- Recursively save value of this global, will be restored on exit - - Del : Boolean := False; - -- This flag gets set True if a True condition has been found, - -- which means that remaining ELSE/ELSIF parts are deleted. - - procedure Analyze_Cond_Then (Cnode : Node_Id); - -- This is applied to either the N_If_Statement node itself or - -- to an N_Elsif_Part node. It deals with analyzing the condition - -- and the THEN statements associated with it. - - procedure Analyze_Cond_Then (Cnode : Node_Id) is - Cond : constant Node_Id := Condition (Cnode); - Tstm : constant List_Id := Then_Statements (Cnode); - - begin - Unblocked_Exit_Count := Unblocked_Exit_Count + 1; - Analyze_And_Resolve (Cond, Any_Boolean); - Check_Unset_Reference (Cond); - - -- If already deleting, then just analyze then statements - - if Del then - Analyze_Statements (Tstm); - - -- Compile time known value, not deleting yet - - elsif Compile_Time_Known_Value (Cond) then - - -- If condition is True, then analyze the THEN statements - -- and set no expansion for ELSE and ELSIF parts. - - if Is_True (Expr_Value (Cond)) then - Analyze_Statements (Tstm); - Del := True; - Expander_Mode_Save_And_Set (False); - - -- If condition is False, analyze THEN with expansion off - - else -- Is_False (Expr_Value (Cond)) - Expander_Mode_Save_And_Set (False); - Analyze_Statements (Tstm); - Expander_Mode_Restore; - end if; - - -- Not known at compile time, not deleting, normal analysis - - else - Analyze_Statements (Tstm); - end if; - end Analyze_Cond_Then; - - -- Start of Analyze_If_Statement - - begin - -- Initialize exit count for else statements. If there is no else - -- part, this count will stay non-zero reflecting the fact that the - -- uncovered else case is an unblocked exit. - - Unblocked_Exit_Count := 1; - Analyze_Cond_Then (N); - - -- Now to analyze the elsif parts if any are present - - if Present (Elsif_Parts (N)) then - E := First (Elsif_Parts (N)); - while Present (E) loop - Analyze_Cond_Then (E); - Next (E); - end loop; - end if; - - if Present (Else_Statements (N)) then - Analyze_Statements (Else_Statements (N)); - end if; - - -- If all our exits were blocked by unconditional transfers of control, - -- then the entire IF statement acts as an unconditional transfer of - -- control, so treat it like one, and check unreachable code. - - if Unblocked_Exit_Count = 0 then - Unblocked_Exit_Count := Save_Unblocked_Exit_Count; - Check_Unreachable_Code (N); - else - Unblocked_Exit_Count := Save_Unblocked_Exit_Count; - end if; - - if Del then - Expander_Mode_Restore; - end if; - - end Analyze_If_Statement; - - ---------------------------------------- - -- Analyze_Implicit_Label_Declaration -- - ---------------------------------------- - - -- An implicit label declaration is generated in the innermost - -- enclosing declarative part. This is done for labels as well as - -- block and loop names. - - -- Note: any changes in this routine may need to be reflected in - -- Analyze_Label_Entity. - - procedure Analyze_Implicit_Label_Declaration (N : Node_Id) is - Id : Node_Id := Defining_Identifier (N); - - begin - Enter_Name (Id); - Set_Ekind (Id, E_Label); - Set_Etype (Id, Standard_Void_Type); - Set_Enclosing_Scope (Id, Current_Scope); - end Analyze_Implicit_Label_Declaration; - - ------------------------------ - -- Analyze_Iteration_Scheme -- - ------------------------------ - - procedure Analyze_Iteration_Scheme (N : Node_Id) is - begin - -- For an infinite loop, there is no iteration scheme - - if No (N) then - return; - - else - declare - Cond : constant Node_Id := Condition (N); - - begin - -- For WHILE loop, verify that the condition is a Boolean - -- expression and resolve and check it. - - if Present (Cond) then - Analyze_And_Resolve (Cond, Any_Boolean); - Check_Unset_Reference (Cond); - - -- Else we have a FOR loop - - else - declare - LP : constant Node_Id := Loop_Parameter_Specification (N); - Id : constant Entity_Id := Defining_Identifier (LP); - DS : constant Node_Id := Discrete_Subtype_Definition (LP); - F : List_Id; - - begin - Enter_Name (Id); - - -- We always consider the loop variable to be referenced, - -- since the loop may be used just for counting purposes. - - Generate_Reference (Id, N, ' '); - - -- Check for case of loop variable hiding a local - -- variable (used later on to give a nice warning - -- if the hidden variable is never assigned). - - declare - H : constant Entity_Id := Homonym (Id); - - begin - if Present (H) - and then Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (H) = - Enclosing_Dynamic_Scope (Id) - and then Ekind (H) = E_Variable - and then Is_Discrete_Type (Etype (H)) - then - Set_Hiding_Loop_Variable (H, Id); - end if; - end; - - -- Now analyze the subtype definition - - Analyze (DS); - - if DS = Error then - return; - end if; - - -- The subtype indication may denote the completion - -- of an incomplete type declaration. - - if Is_Entity_Name (DS) - and then Present (Entity (DS)) - and then Is_Type (Entity (DS)) - and then Ekind (Entity (DS)) = E_Incomplete_Type - then - Set_Entity (DS, Get_Full_View (Entity (DS))); - Set_Etype (DS, Entity (DS)); - end if; - - if not Is_Discrete_Type (Etype (DS)) then - Wrong_Type (DS, Any_Discrete); - Set_Etype (DS, Any_Type); - end if; - - Make_Index (DS, LP); - - Set_Ekind (Id, E_Loop_Parameter); - Set_Etype (Id, Etype (DS)); - Set_Is_Known_Valid (Id, True); - - -- The loop is not a declarative part, so the only entity - -- declared "within" must be frozen explicitly. Since the - -- type of this entity has already been frozen, this cannot - -- generate any freezing actions. - - F := Freeze_Entity (Id, Sloc (LP)); - pragma Assert (F = No_List); - - -- Check for null or possibly null range and issue warning. - -- We suppress such messages in generic templates and - -- instances, because in practice they tend to be dubious - -- in these cases. - - if Nkind (DS) = N_Range - and then Comes_From_Source (N) - and then not Inside_A_Generic - and then not In_Instance - then - declare - L : constant Node_Id := Low_Bound (DS); - H : constant Node_Id := High_Bound (DS); - - Llo : Uint; - Lhi : Uint; - LOK : Boolean; - Hlo : Uint; - Hhi : Uint; - HOK : Boolean; - - begin - Determine_Range (L, LOK, Llo, Lhi); - Determine_Range (H, HOK, Hlo, Hhi); - - -- If range of loop is null, issue warning - - if (LOK and HOK) and then Llo > Hhi then - Error_Msg_N - ("?loop range is null, loop will not execute", - DS); - - -- The other case for a warning is a reverse loop - -- where the upper bound is the integer literal - -- zero or one, and the lower bound can be positive. - - elsif Reverse_Present (LP) - and then Nkind (H) = N_Integer_Literal - and then (Intval (H) = Uint_0 - or else - Intval (H) = Uint_1) - and then Lhi > Hhi - then - Warn_On_Instance := True; - Error_Msg_N ("?loop range may be null", DS); - Warn_On_Instance := False; - end if; - end; - end if; - end; - end if; - end; - end if; - end Analyze_Iteration_Scheme; - - ------------------- - -- Analyze_Label -- - ------------------- - - -- Important note: normally this routine is called from Analyze_Statements - -- which does a prescan, to make sure that the Reachable flags are set on - -- all labels before encountering a possible goto to one of these labels. - -- If expanded code analyzes labels via the normal Sem path, then it must - -- ensure that Reachable is set early enough to avoid problems in the case - -- of a forward goto. - - procedure Analyze_Label (N : Node_Id) is - Lab : Entity_Id; - - begin - Analyze (Identifier (N)); - Lab := Entity (Identifier (N)); - - -- If we found a label mark it as reachable. - - if Ekind (Lab) = E_Label then - Generate_Definition (Lab); - Set_Reachable (Lab); - - if Nkind (Parent (Lab)) = N_Implicit_Label_Declaration then - Set_Label_Construct (Parent (Lab), N); - end if; - - -- If we failed to find a label, it means the implicit declaration - -- of the label was hidden. A for-loop parameter can do this to a - -- label with the same name inside the loop, since the implicit label - -- declaration is in the innermost enclosing body or block statement. - - else - Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Lab); - Error_Msg_N - ("implicit label declaration for & is hidden#", - Identifier (N)); - end if; - end Analyze_Label; - - -------------------------- - -- Analyze_Label_Entity -- - -------------------------- - - procedure Analyze_Label_Entity (E : Entity_Id) is - begin - Set_Ekind (E, E_Label); - Set_Etype (E, Standard_Void_Type); - Set_Enclosing_Scope (E, Current_Scope); - Set_Reachable (E, True); - end Analyze_Label_Entity; - - ---------------------------- - -- Analyze_Loop_Statement -- - ---------------------------- - - procedure Analyze_Loop_Statement (N : Node_Id) is - Id : constant Node_Id := Identifier (N); - Ent : Entity_Id; - - begin - if Present (Id) then - - -- Make name visible, e.g. for use in exit statements. Loop - -- labels are always considered to be referenced. - - Analyze (Id); - Ent := Entity (Id); - Generate_Reference (Ent, N, ' '); - Generate_Definition (Ent); - - -- If we found a label, mark its type. If not, ignore it, since it - -- means we have a conflicting declaration, which would already have - -- been diagnosed at declaration time. Set Label_Construct of the - -- implicit label declaration, which is not created by the parser - -- for generic units. - - if Ekind (Ent) = E_Label then - Set_Ekind (Ent, E_Loop); - - if Nkind (Parent (Ent)) = N_Implicit_Label_Declaration then - Set_Label_Construct (Parent (Ent), N); - end if; - end if; - - -- Case of no identifier present - - else - Ent := New_Internal_Entity (E_Loop, Current_Scope, Sloc (N), 'L'); - Set_Etype (Ent, Standard_Void_Type); - Set_Parent (Ent, N); - end if; - - New_Scope (Ent); - Analyze_Iteration_Scheme (Iteration_Scheme (N)); - Analyze_Statements (Statements (N)); - Process_End_Label (N, 'e'); - End_Scope; - end Analyze_Loop_Statement; - - ---------------------------- - -- Analyze_Null_Statement -- - ---------------------------- - - -- Note: the semantics of the null statement is implemented by a single - -- null statement, too bad everything isn't as simple as this! - - procedure Analyze_Null_Statement (N : Node_Id) is - begin - null; - end Analyze_Null_Statement; - - ------------------------ - -- Analyze_Statements -- - ------------------------ - - procedure Analyze_Statements (L : List_Id) is - S : Node_Id; - - begin - -- The labels declared in the statement list are reachable from - -- statements in the list. We do this as a prepass so that any - -- goto statement will be properly flagged if its target is not - -- reachable. This is not required, but is nice behavior! - - S := First (L); - - while Present (S) loop - if Nkind (S) = N_Label then - Analyze_Label (S); - end if; - - Next (S); - end loop; - - -- Perform semantic analysis on all statements - - S := First (L); - - while Present (S) loop - - if Nkind (S) /= N_Label then - Analyze (S); - end if; - - Next (S); - end loop; - - -- Make labels unreachable. Visibility is not sufficient, because - -- labels in one if-branch for example are not reachable from the - -- other branch, even though their declarations are in the enclosing - -- declarative part. - - S := First (L); - - while Present (S) loop - if Nkind (S) = N_Label then - Set_Reachable (Entity (Identifier (S)), False); - end if; - - Next (S); - end loop; - end Analyze_Statements; - - ---------------------------- - -- Check_Unreachable_Code -- - ---------------------------- - - procedure Check_Unreachable_Code (N : Node_Id) is - Error_Loc : Source_Ptr; - P : Node_Id; - - begin - if Is_List_Member (N) - and then Comes_From_Source (N) - then - declare - Nxt : Node_Id; - - begin - Nxt := Original_Node (Next (N)); - - if Present (Nxt) - and then Comes_From_Source (Nxt) - and then Is_Statement (Nxt) - then - -- Special very annoying exception. If we have a return that - -- follows a raise, then we allow it without a warning, since - -- the Ada RM annoyingly requires a useless return here! - - if Nkind (Original_Node (N)) /= N_Raise_Statement - or else Nkind (Nxt) /= N_Return_Statement - then - -- The rather strange shenanigans with the warning message - -- here reflects the fact that Kill_Dead_Code is very good - -- at removing warnings in deleted code, and this is one - -- warning we would prefer NOT to have removed :-) - - Error_Loc := Sloc (Nxt); - - -- If we have unreachable code, analyze and remove the - -- unreachable code, since it is useless and we don't - -- want to generate junk warnings. - - -- We skip this step if we are not in code generation mode. - -- This is the one case where we remove dead code in the - -- semantics as opposed to the expander, and we do not want - -- to remove code if we are not in code generation mode, - -- since this messes up the ASIS trees. - - -- Note that one might react by moving the whole circuit to - -- exp_ch5, but then we lose the warning in -gnatc mode. - - if Operating_Mode = Generate_Code then - loop - Nxt := Next (N); - exit when No (Nxt) or else not Is_Statement (Nxt); - Analyze (Nxt); - Remove (Nxt); - Kill_Dead_Code (Nxt); - end loop; - end if; - - -- Now issue the warning - - Error_Msg ("?unreachable code", Error_Loc); - end if; - - -- If the unconditional transfer of control instruction is - -- the last statement of a sequence, then see if our parent - -- is an IF statement, and if so adjust the unblocked exit - -- count of the if statement to reflect the fact that this - -- branch of the if is indeed blocked by a transfer of control. - - else - P := Parent (N); - - if Nkind (P) = N_If_Statement then - null; - - elsif Nkind (P) = N_Elsif_Part then - P := Parent (P); - pragma Assert (Nkind (P) = N_If_Statement); - - elsif Nkind (P) = N_Case_Statement_Alternative then - P := Parent (P); - pragma Assert (Nkind (P) = N_Case_Statement); - - else - return; - end if; - - Unblocked_Exit_Count := Unblocked_Exit_Count - 1; - end if; - end; - end if; - end Check_Unreachable_Code; - -end Sem_Ch5;