Imported gcc-4.4.3

[msp430-gcc.git] / gcc / testsuite / g++.old-deja / g++.bugs / 900220_01.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900220_01.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900220_01.C
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index df7e641..0000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.bugs/900220_01.C
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-// g++ 1.36.1 bug 900220_01
-
-// Ref: 12.8
-
-// Section 12.8 says:
-
-//     "That is, X::operator=() will be generated only if no assignment
-//     operation is explicitly declared and an object of class X is actually
-//     assigned an object of class X (or an object of a class derived from X)
-//     or if the address of X::operator= is taken.
-
-// g++ does not allow you to take the address of an implicitly generated
-// operator=
-
-// keywords: operator=, implicit copy operator, operator&
-
-struct struct0 {
-  int data_member;
-};
-
-typedef struct0& (struct0::*member_func_t) (const struct0&);
-
-member_func_t member_func;
-
-void global_function_0 (member_func_t member_f)
-{                                              // gets bogus error - ref from below
-}
-
-void global_function_1 ()
-{
-  member_func = &struct0::operator=;           // gets bogus error
-
-  global_function_0 (&struct0::operator=);     // gets bogus error
-}
-
-int main () { return 0; }