Imported gcc-4.4.3

[msp430-gcc.git] / gcc / testsuite / g++.old-deja / g++.oliva / typename2.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.oliva/typename2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.oliva/typename2.C
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index f0737cd..0000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.oliva/typename2.C
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-// Build don't link:
-// Special g++ Options:
-
-// Copyright (C) 1999 Free Software Foundation
-
-// by Alexandre Oliva <oliva@dcc.unicamp.br>
-// based on bug report by Nick Rasmussen <nick@jive.org>
-
-// This is slightly different from typename1.C.  This one tests
-// whether the implicit typename extension works.  gcc 2.95 reports:
-
-// warning: lookup of `foo' finds `struct foo'
-// warning:   instead of `baz<T>::foo' from dependent base class
-// warning:   (use `typename baz::foo' if that's what you meant)
-
-// But baz<T>::foo is not a base class, and `foo' should have been
-// found in baz's scope.
-
-struct foo;
-
-template <class T> struct bar {
-  typedef int foo;
-};
-
-template <class T> struct baz {
-  typedef bar<T>::foo foo; // ERROR - implicit typename
-  void m(foo); 
-};