Imported gcc-4.4.3

[msp430-gcc.git] / gcc / testsuite / gcc.c-torture / execute / 20010910-1.c

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20010910-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20010910-1.c
deleted file mode 100644 (file)
index 185e29d..0000000
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20010910-1.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-/* Test case contributed by Ingo Rohloff <rohloff@in.tum.de>.
-   Code distilled from Linux kernel.  */
-
-/* Compile this program with a gcc-2.95.2 using
-   "gcc -O2" and run it. The result will be that
-   rx_ring[1].next == 0   (it should be == 14)
-   and
-   ep.skbuff[4] == 5      (it should be 0)
-*/
-
-extern void abort(void);
-
-struct epic_rx_desc 
-{
-  unsigned int next;
-};
-
-struct epic_private 
-{
-  struct epic_rx_desc *rx_ring;
-  unsigned int rx_skbuff[5];
-};
-
-static void epic_init_ring(struct epic_private *ep)
-{
-  int i;
-
-  for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) 
-  {
-    ep->rx_ring[i].next = 10 + (i+1)*2;
-    ep->rx_skbuff[i] = 0;
-  }
-  ep->rx_ring[i-1].next = 10;
-}
-
-static int check_rx_ring[5] = { 12,14,16,18,10 };
-
-int main(void)
-{
-  struct epic_private ep;
-  struct epic_rx_desc rx_ring[5];
-  int i;
-
-  for (i=0;i<5;i++)
-  {
-    rx_ring[i].next=0;
-    ep.rx_skbuff[i]=5;
-  }
-  
-  ep.rx_ring=rx_ring;
-  epic_init_ring(&ep);
-  
-  for (i=0;i<5;i++)
-  {
-    if ( rx_ring[i].next != check_rx_ring[i] ) abort();
-    if ( ep.rx_skbuff[i] != 0 ) abort();
-  }
-  return 0;
-}